Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Need To Know

I’ve previously mentioned Rodney Brooks approach to robotics, and also “bottom up” views of knowledge. Here’s a nice quote (from Brian Rotman, Mathematics as Sign, p115):

Brooks’ attachment to the bottom-up procedure is also performative, ruling the description as well as the content of his approach. Thus, not only mind—problem solving, central control, representation—is subordinated within his model of intelligence but also its sociocultural correlates—philosophy, abstract thought, theory—are likewise invoked by him on a minimal, need-to-know basis.

This appeals to me, in part, because it chimes with my views about another form of abstract knowledge that’s central to programming: knowledge of programming languages.
Continue Reading »

On Cynicism

I’ve got a piece entitled “Look and Feel” in preparation. I deliberately pre-announced it as a way of forcing myself to finish it off. However, the idea hinges on the difference between visual and “kinesthetic”(visceral/tactile/proprioceptive) thinking, and so might require me to talk about neurolinguistic programming. To be honest, I’ve had more than my fill of non-religiously spiritual waffle just recently, so I think I’ll give it a miss—for the time being, at least.

So instead, I’m going to talk about something completely different. I’m going to talk about cynicism.
Continue Reading »

Free ideas

To lighten the mood for the New Year, I’ve got a few suggestions for anyone who wants them. Make of them what you will.

  • Career Freelance café consultant. (Probably not very lucrative, but might be quite pleasant nonetheless.)
  • Song title “Martin Amis fought the cliché and the cliché won”.
  • Album title “The Afterbirth of Cool”. (Might be suitable for noodling jazz-rock types.)
  • Exam questionInteractive fiction is gamified narrative.” Discuss.
  • Meme Lolkits: suitably captioned portraits of Kit Marlowe. Bonus points for remembering that he died in an argument about a bar bill (the “reckoning”).
  • Software methodology article “The Look and Feel of Technical Meetings”. My next planned post might expand on that, a bit.

Taxi ride

I have been to the America twice in my life. The first time was when I was about 11, visiting a family who had been neighbours when they were living in England, but had moved back to the US; to Connecticut, as it happens. The second time was much more recently.
Continue Reading »

In my write-up of Charlie Hull’s presentation on Open Source Search engines, I said that he gave a number of case studies. One of them concerned a major newspaper publisher. Although this wasn’t in the write-up, in private conversation I have incorrectly referred to them as being an Autonomy customer, when they were in fact a FAST customer.

Apologies for any confusion caused.

Here’s a photo I took from my phone, a few months ago.
"Thinking, Fast and Slow", next to blood stain
I had to take an unexpected journey, and had to make a quick decision, in less than ideal circumstances, as to what I would take with me. If, instead of this book and my phone, I had picked up my battered old iPod, then subsequent events might have taken a very different course.

Kevin Simler’s recent posting on ethics and programming features one of my favourite Brian Kernighan quotes. (I won’t repeat it here, as you can read it there.) This reminded me of another favourite thing: the cover illustration to The Practice of Programming, which features a little dog pointing out the book’s trio of key concepts.
Continue Reading »

In the light of Venkat Rao’s theory of gollumization and raving fandom, it’s reasonable to ask the question: “Am I a raving Venkat Rao fan?”

There’s evidence on both sides, but here’s my case against.

Admittedly, I dutifully gave away my stealth edition of Tempo, and claimed my free Kindle edition to replace it. But, although the content was all very interesting, there was something I didn’t quite like about either edition. I didn’t like the way they smelled. To quote Rupert Giles:

Smell is the most powerful trigger to the memory there is. A certain flower, or a whiff of smoke can bring up experiences long forgotten. Books smell musty and rich. The knowledge gained from a computer is a — it, uh, it has no texture, no context. It’s there and then it’s gone. If it’s to last, then the getting of knowledge should be, uh, tangible, it should be, um, smelly.

Let’s pick a different example. Perhaps a neglected difference between a satnav nomad’s understanding of a city, and The Knowledge of London is in smell: fried breakfast, stale cigarettes, diesel, piss.

I don’t normally pay that much attention to up-coming films. (I’m avoiding agreeing to see The Hobbit…) However this one recently came to my attention.

It all looks rather intriguing. Hopefully it will be shown at the Arts Picture House, when it comes out.

Kids these days…

I must be getting old. Surely it should be Mr. Asbo Swan. Also: “Evek”?
Asbo Swan sez evek da law